Main Archives & Search
News World Order
News World Order
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human
rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission
from the copyright owner.
THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY
EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
A DOCUMENTARY REVIEW
OF CHARTERS AND TREATIES
August 17, 1996
The trouble with history is, we weren't there when
it took place and it can be changed to fit someones belief and/or traditions,
or it can be taught in the public schools to favor a political agenda,
and withhold many facts. I know you have been taught that we won the Revolutionary
War and defeated the British, but I can prove to the contrary. I want you
to read this paper with an open mind, and allow yourself to be instructed
with the following verifiable facts. You be the judge and don't let prior
conclusions on your part or incorrect teaching, keep you from the truth.
I too was always taught in school and in studying our
history books that our freedom came from the Declaration of Independence
and was secured by our winning the Revolutionary War. I'm going to discuss
a few documents that are included at the end of this paper, in the footnotes.
The first document is the first Charter of Virginia in 1606 (footnote #1).
In the first paragraph, the king of England granted our fore fathers license
to settle and colonize America. The definition for license is as follows.
"In Government Regulation. Authority to do some act
or carry on some trade or business, in its nature lawful but prohibited
by statute, except with the permission of the civil authority or which
would otherwise be unlawful." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914.
Keep in mind those that came to America from England
were British subjects. So you can better understand what I'm going to tell
you, here are the definitions for subject and citizen.
"In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one
who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch." Bouvier's Law Dictionary,
"Constitutional Law. One that owes allegiance to a
sovereign and is governed by his laws. The natives of Great Britain are
subjects of the British government. Men in free governments are subjects
as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects
they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense,
in countries enjoying a republican form of government." Swiss Nat. Ins.
Co. v. Miller, 267 U.S. 42, 45 S. Ct. 213, 214, 69 L.Ed. 504. Blacks fifth
I chose to give the definition for subject first, so
you could better understand what definition of citizen is really being
used in American law. Below is the definition of citizen from Roman law.
"The term citizen was used in Rome to indicate the
possession of private civil rights, including those accruing under the
Roman family and inheritance law and the Roman contract and property law.
All other subjects were peregrines. But in the beginning of the 3d century
the distinction was abolished and all subjects were citizens; 1 sel. Essays
in Anglo-Amer. L. H. 578." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914.
The king was making a commercial venture when he sent
his subjects to America, and used his money and resources to do so. I think
you would admit the king had a lawful right to receive gain and prosper
from his venture. In the Virginia Charter he declares his sovereignty over
the land and his subjects and in paragraph 9 he declares the amount of
gold, silver and copper he is to receive if any is found by his subjects.
There could have just as easily been none, or his subjects could have been
killed by the Indians. This is why this was a valid right of the king (Jure
Coronae, "In right of the crown," Black's forth Ed.), the king expended
his resources with the risk of total loss.
If you'll notice in paragraph 9 the king declares that
all his heirs and successors were to also receive the same amount of gold,
silver and copper that he claimed with this Charter. The gold that remained
in the colonies was also the kings. He provided the remainder as a benefit
for his subjects, which amounted to further use of his capital. You will
see in this paper that not only is this valid, but it is still in effect
today. If you will read the rest of the Virginia Charter you will see that
the king declared the right and exercised the power to regulate every aspect
of commerce in his new colony. A license had to be granted for travel connected
with transfer of goods (commerce) right down to the furniture they sat
on. A great deal of the king's declared property was ceded to America in
the Treaty of 1783. I want you to stay focused on the money and the commerce
which was not ceded to America.
This brings us to the Declaration of Independence.
Our freedom was declared because the king did not fulfill his end of the
covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was taxation without
representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606 Charter granted
by the king. It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England,
most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the king. Because of
the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief, separation from
England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of freedom and self determination
became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan "Don't Tread On Me"
was the standard borne by the militias.
The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when
Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have
been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document
I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having
won the Revolutionary War. (footnote 2).
I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the
king refers to himself as prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United
States. You know from this that the United States did not negotiate this
Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but it is obvious
that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of
further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind
as you study these documents. You also need to understand the players of
those that negotiated this Treaty. For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin
Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title
An Esquire in the above usage was a granted rank and
Title of nobility by the king, which is below Knight and above a yeoman,
common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do manual labor as signified
by this status, see the below definitions.
"Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of
the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown....for
whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who studieth in the universities,
who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without
manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman,
he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman." Blackstone
Commentaries p. 561-562
"Esquire - In English Law. A title of dignity next
above gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to sheriffs,
serjeants, and barristers at law, justices of the peace, and others." Blacks
Law Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641
Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John Jay as you can
read in the Treaty were all Esquires and were the signers of this Treaty
and the only negotiators of the Treaty. The representative of the king
was David Hartley Esqr..
Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms
of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between England and France.
The use of Esquire declared his and the others British subjection and loyalty
to the crown.
In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings
claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to continue receiving
gold, silver and copper as gain for his business venture. Article 3 gives
Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States and its
rivers. In article 4 the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts.
If you will read my other papers on money you will understand that the
financiers were working with the king. Why else would he protect their
interest with this Treaty?
I wonder if you have seen the main and obvious point?
This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781. If the United
States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to America, when
we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the Revolutionary
War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty,
when they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration
of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary
War, the king granting us our land would not be necessary, it would have
been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War. To not dictate the terms
of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a war; means
the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we
defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for
surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status and privilege granted
by the king and insure the subjection of future unaware generations. Worst
of all, they sold out those that gave their lives and property for the
chance to be free.
When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington he surrendered
the battle, not the war. Read the Article of Capitulation signed by Cornwallis
at Yorktown (footnote 3)
Jonathan Williams recorded in his book, Legions of
Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his surrender
that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America
will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly
be loyal subjects to the Crown."...."in less than two hundred years the
whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government
that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire."
All the Treaty did was remove the United States as
a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material
and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time he retained
financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still
being created today; millions of dollars a day. And his heirs and successors
are still reaping the benefit of the kings original venture. If you will
read the following quote from Title 26, you will see just one situation
where the king is still collecting a tax from those that receive a benefit
from him, on property which is purchased with the money the king supplies,
at almost the same percentage:
26 USC Sec. 1491
Sec. 1491. Imposition of tax
There is hereby imposed on the transfer of property by a citizen or resident of the United States, or by a domestic corporation or partnership, or by an estate or trust which is not a foreign estate or trust, to a foreign corporation as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to capital, or to a foreign estate or trust, or to a foreign partnership, an excise tax equal to 35 percent of the excess of -
(1) the fair market value of the property so transferred, over
(2) the sum of -
(A) the adjusted basis (for determining gain) of such property in the hands of the transferor, plus
(B) the amount of the gain recognized to the transferor
at the time of the transfer.
(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 365; Oct. 4, 1976,
Pub. L. 94-455, title X, Sec. 1015(a), 90 Stat. 1617; Nov. 6, 1978, Pub.
L. 95-600, title VII, Sec. 701(u)(14)(A), 92 Stat. 2919.)
1978 - Pub. L. 95-600 substituted 'estate or trust' for 'trust' wherever appearing.
1976 - Pub. L. 94-455 substituted in provisions preceding par.
(1) 'property' for 'stocks and securities' and '35 percent' for '27 1/2 percent' and in par.
(1) 'fair market value' for 'value' and 'property' for 'stocks and securities' and in par.
(2) designated existing provisions as subpar. (A) and added subpar. (B).
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT
Section 701(u)(14)(C) of Pub. L. 95-600 provided that: 'The amendments made by this paragraph (amending this section and section 1492 of this title) shall apply to transfers after October 2, 1975.'
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1976 AMENDMENT
Section 1015(d) of Pub. L. 94-455 provided that: 'The
amendments made by this section (enacting section 1057 of this title, amending
this section and section 1492 of this title, and renumbering former section
1057 as 1058 of this title) shall apply to transfers of property after
October 2, 1975.'
A new war was declared when the Treaty was signed.
The king wanted his land back and he knew he would be able to regain his
property for his heirs with the help of his world financiers. Here is a
quote from the king speaking to Parliament after the Revolutionary War
(Six weeks after) the capitulation of Yorktown, the king of Great Britain, in his speech to Parliament (Nov. 27, 1781), declared "That he should not answer the trust committed to the sovereign of a free people, if he consented to sacrifice either to his own desire of peace, or to their temporary ease and relief, those essential rights and permanent interests, upon the maintenance and preservation of which the future strength and security of the country must forever depend." The determined language of this speech, pointing to the continuance of the American war, was echoed back by a majority of both Lords and Commons.
In a few days after (Dec. 12), it was moved in the
House of Commons that a resolution should be adopted declaring it to be
their opinion "That all farther attempts to reduce the Americans to obedience
by force would be ineffectual, and injurious to the true interests of Great
Britain." The rest of the debate can be found in (footnote 4). What were
the true interests of the king? The gold, silver and copper.
The new war was to be fought without Americans being
aware that a war was even being waged, it was to be fought by subterfuge
and key personnel being placed in key positions. The first two parts of
"A Country Defeated In Victory," go into detail about how this was done
and exposes some of the main players.
Every time you pay a tax you are transferring your
labor to the king, and his heirs and successors are still receiving interest
from the original American Charters.
The following is the definition of tribute (tax).
"A contribution which is raised by a prince or sovereign
from his subjects to sustain the expenses of the state. A sum of money
paid by an inferior sovereign or state to a superior potentate, to secure
the friendship or protection of the latter." Blacks Law Dictionary forth
ed. p. 1677
As further evidence, not that any is needed, a percentage
of taxes that are paid are to enrich the king/queen of England. For those
that study Title 26 you will recognize IMF, which means Individual Master
File, all tax payers have one. To read one you have to be able to break
their codes using file 6209, which is about 467 pages. On your IMF you
will find a blocking series, which tells you what type of tax you are paying.
You will probably find a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 says is reserved.
You then look up the BMF 300-399, which is the Business Master File in
6209. You would have seen prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims,
non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is considered a business and involved
in commerce and you are being held liable for a tax via a treaty between
the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.. The form that is supposed to
be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA - Foreign Investment Real Property
Tax Account, you won't find many people using this form, just the 1040
form. The 8288 form can be found in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS,
chapter 3. If you will check the OMB's paper - Office of Management and
Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information Collections,
Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB
number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions
by foreign persons of U.S. real property interests-statement of withholding
on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a. These codes
have since been changed to read as follows; IMF 300-309, Barred Assement,
CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form. IMF
310-399 reserved, the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399
reads U.S./U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. The long and short of it is nothing
changed, the government just made it plainer, the 1040 is the payment of
a foreign tax to the king/queen of England. We have been in financial servitude
since the Treaty of 1783.
Another Treaty between England and the United States
was Jay's Treaty of 1794 (footnote 5). If you will remember from the Paris
Treaty of 1783, John Jay Esqr. was one of the negotiators of the Treaty.
In 1794 he negotiated another Treaty with Britain. There was great controversy
among the American people about this Treaty.
In Article 2 you will see the king is still on land
that was supposed to be ceded to the United States at the Paris Treaty.
This is 13 years after America supposedly won the Revolutionary War. I
guess someone forgot to tell the king of England. In Article 6, the king
is still dictating terms to the United States concerning the collection
of debt and damages, the British government and World Bankers claimed we
owe. In Article 12 we find the king dictating terms again, this time concerning
where and with who the United States could trade. In Article 18 the United
States agrees to a wide variety of material that would be subject to confiscation
if Britain found said material going to its enemies ports. Who won the
That's right, we were conned by some of our early fore
fathers into believing that we are free and sovereign people, when in fact
we had the same status as before the Revolutionary War. I say had, because
our status is far worse now than then. I'll explain.
Early on in our history the king was satisfied with the interest made by the Bank of the United States. But when the Bank Charter was canceled in 1811 it was time to gain control of the government, in order to shape government policy and public policy. Have you never asked yourself why the British, after burning the White House and all our early records during the War of 1812, left and did not take over the government. The reason they did, was to remove the greatest barrier to their plans for this country. That barrier was the newly adopted 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose for this Amendment was to stop anyone from serving in the government who was receiving a Title of nobility or honor. It was and is obvious that these government employees would be loyal to the granter of the Title of nobility or honor.
The War of 1812 served several purposes. It delayed
the passage of the 13th Amendment by Virginia, allowed the British to destroy
the evidence of the first 12 states ratification of this Amendment, and
it increased the national debt, which would coerce the Congress to reestablish
the Bank Charter in 1816 after the Treaty of Ghent was ratified by the
Senate in 1815.
In recognition of creativity,
integrity and excellence on the Web.
"You'll find news links on this site
you didn't even know existed"..
Main Archives & Search
News World Order
by tusk36: Altoona, Pennsylvania, U.S.A